Mere Civility: Disagreement And The Limits Of Tolerance
A New Statesman Best Book of the Year A Church Times Book of the Year We are facing a crisis of civility, a war of words polluting our public sphere. In liberal democracies committed to tolerating active, often heated disagreement, the loss of this virtue appears critical. Most modern appeals to civility follow arguments by Hobbes or Locke by proposing to suppress disagreement or exclude views we deem āuncivilā for the sake of social harmony. By comparison, mere civilityāa grudging conformity to norms of respectful behaviorāas defended by Rhode Islandās founder, Roger Williams, might seem minimal and unappealing. Yet Teresa Bejan argues that Williamsās outlook offers a promising path forward in confronting our own crisis, one that challenges our fundamental assumptions about what a tolerantāand civilāsociety should look like. āPenetrating and sophisticated.ā āJames Ryerson, New York Times Book Review āWould that more of us might learn to look into the past with such gravity and humility. We might end up with a more (or mere) civil society, yet.ā āLos Angeles Review of Books āA deeply admirable book: original, persuasive, witty, and eloquent.ā āJacob T. Levy, Review of Politics āA terrific bookālearned, vigorous, and challenging.ā āAlison McQueen, Stanford University